Follow Me On Twitter!

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

Who Could Be Against War Funding. Or, When War Funding Isn't Just War Funding

Democrats are crafty, I will give them that. But they are also liars, sleazy, and snake-like. Take a look at the specifics related to the $100 billion bill to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Click here for story: U.S. War Funding Bill Brims With Unrelated Extras

Notice:

A $100 billion bill to fund U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is rapidly accumulating extra items such as money for military aircraft the Pentagon doesn't want and possibly a scheme to jump-start sagging auto sales.

The cars and planes are not directly linked to the U.S. war effort. But they are typical of Congress' penchant for loading bills with unrelated spending in hopes the funds will sail through on the strength of the main legislation.

President Barack Obama originally sought $83.4 billion for the two wars and more foreign aid for countries like Pakistan.

But then he too sought more -- $4 billion extra to combat H1N1 swine flu and $5 billion to back credit lines to the International Monetary Fund, which is trying to help developing countries weather the global economic downturn.


Wow. And why would they use this bill to try to shove through such ridiculous pork? The answer lies in this excerpt:

A senior Democratic House aide said the requests for flu and Pakistan money were appropriate to include in the bill because they were emergency needs Obama cited. The aide also noted that Republicans in the past backed items like the IMF funds.

"This is a dangerous game Republicans are playing by jeopardizing the well-being of our soldiers to score political points," the aide said. "The supplemental will be passed, but they will have to answer for their actions if they oppose it."


So they admit that if Republicans object to the pork, then Democrats (and their cronies known as the media) will use it to bash them for opposing "war funding for our soldiers". Please.

Don't worry folks, the treasury will just print more money...........

No comments: