Follow Me On Twitter!

Monday, November 30, 2009

When Liberals Turn On Liberals!

This makes me laugh, though I am not sure why. Here you go:

Click here: Former Playboy Bunnies Turned Animal Rights Activists Blast Obama

But the Barbi twins and Shane’s hubby, actor Ken Wahl, also have a pretty powerful bone to pick with the President and the fact he picked a pound puppy over the Kennedy’s “gift” of a Portuguese water dog (SIC).

“Obama didn’t even have to say a word; all he had to do was get an animal out of the pound. It would have been no effort on his part but it would have spoken volumes. He should have led by example which is what a good president is supposed to do. Everyone was disappointed, he could have used discretion and taken the Kennedy puppy privately and taken the pound puppy publicly.”

And the action has apparently caused many animal lovers to totally re-evaluate their political stance.

“He's got such a big following, he doesn’t realize how big the animal community is so you can image how disappointed everyone is. I know so many Democrats that have gone republican just from that one move and he didn’t keep to his word. My good friend Jana Kohl (Sen. Herb Kohl's niece) very much campaigned for Obama and brought the whole animal community behind him. She got a photo with him and her pound puppy, so she was very disappointed when he didn’t get one,” Shane continued. “The Democrats have been very discouraging toward a lot of animal issues, I’m starting to open up the eyes of a lot of people, and it’s a money issue. I’ve seen a lot of Democrats let down the animal side because there is a big business and a lot of money to be made on the liberal side of animal extortion.”

This is too funny to me. Liberals turn on liberals over their choice of a puppy??!? And I get attacked because I won't do business with pro-Obama companies. Then again, consistency was never the forte of liberals.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Matt Damon Is An Idiot

I've decided to make this idiot feature a regular here at Steven's World. And today's idiot feature will star Matt Damon.

Damon is one of those rare Hollywood actors that really did graduate from high school. Okay that isn't what makes him an idiot. What makes Damon an idiot is that he is an idiot. Too simplistic? Well when it comes to Matty Damon simplistic should suffice. But I will be glad to expound.

What makes Matt a real idiot is this from last year's election:


I think there's a really good chance that Sarah Palin could be president, and I think that's a really scary thing. Because I don't know anything about her. I don't think in eight weeks I'm gonna know anything about her. I know that she was a mayor of a really, really small town, and she's governor of Alaska for less than two years. I just don't understand - I think the pick was made for political purposes, but in terms of governance, it's a disaster. You do the actuary tables, you know, there's a one out of three chance, if not more, that McCain doesn't survive his first term, and it'll be President Palin. And it really, you know, was talking about it earlier, it's like a really bad Disney movie. You know, the hockey mom, you know, "I'm just a hockey mom from Alaska," and she's the president. And it's like she's facing down Vladimir Putin and you know, using the folksy stuff she learned at the hockey rink, you know, it's just absurd. It's totally absurd, and I don't understand why more people aren't talking about how absurd it is.'s a really terrifying possibility. The fact that we've gotten this far and we're that close to this being a reality is crazy. Crazy. I mean, did she really - I need to know if she really thinks dinosaurs were here 4000 years ago. That's an important - I want to know that. I really do. Because she's gonna have the nuclear codes. You know, I wanna know if she thinks dinosaurs were here 4000 years ago, or if she banned books or tried to ban books. I mean, you know, we can't have that.

I have a question. What does believing in a young earth have to do with holding the nuclear codes? Seriously. What correlation is Damon trying to draw? That if you believe that the earth is less than 10,000 years old then you are going to push the button as president for no reason? This guy is an idiot.

Damon then raises the spectrum of Palin's banning books, an accusation leveled at her shortly after she was named John McCain's running mate. Ask Matt in private what he thinks should be done with books written by Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, or Sean Hannity. Interesting how these morons are so pro free speech until it is speech they disagree with.

I also love the way Damon speaks as if it was a foregone conclusion that McCain was going to die, and that Palin would ascend to the presidency.

You do the actuary tables, you know, there's a one out of three chance, if not more, that McCain doesn't survive his first term, and it'll be President Palin.

33% chance according to actuarial tables. Remember, those do not take into account the health care that is given to a sitting president. The truth is that if you factor all factors in (not to mention what McCain had already survived in his life up to this point), the chance that McCain would die in 4 years was much less than 33%.

Of course, a brainiac like Damon doesn't care about facts. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a guy that attended Harvard and quit 12 credits shy of a degree. 12 credits. 3 classes. ARE YOU SERIOUS? That is like having a lead in the fourth quarter of the Superbowl, with 2 minutes left, and forfeiting! Yet this guy has the gall to question someone else's intelligence?

Why would Damon speak as if President Palin was a foregone conclusion? Simple. The politics of fear. He was playing the fear card. Scare people away from the McCain/Palin ticket, and get people, out of fear, to vote for Obama/Biden. Ahh yes, the liberals that bad mouthed Bush for scaring people into supporting two wars are happy to play the fear card themselves whenever it is convenient.

Damon also loves to try to throw out a big word or two to try to make himself sound more intelligent. "Actuary tables." Never mind that the proper term is 'actuarial tables'. Please. Matt, just because you played a genius in one of your movies doesn't mean you are one in real life.

But my favorite part is this:

I think there's a really good chance that Sarah Palin could be president, and I think that's a really scary thing. Because I don't know anything about her. I don't think in eight weeks I'm gonna know anything about her.

Hello! Barack Obama anyone? No one knew much about Obama, still do not know much about Obama, but ol' Matt here ran happily to the polls to cast his vote for Obama, and all without knowing much about him. Funny how he has no problem putting a label on one person, and to completely ignore the same qualities of another. The double standard is off the chart.

So Matt gets the idiot label for making, well, an idiot of himself. I can't wait until 2012 to hear more nuggets of wisdom from a guy that can't go more than 10 minutes of any movie he is in without using the F-word. Yeah, he is a real voice of moral clarity.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Steven Crowder Blows The Lid Off Of Guantanamo Bay!


Chairman Zero (Obama for those of you slow on the uptake) ran an election based on a message of hope and change. Who the hope was for, and what change, are still topics that are fiercely debated, but I digress. The key was that that he wanted to provide hope and bring a wind of change to America.

What has followed has been dashed hope, and the kind of change that we Americans do not want. Stimulus (read: political payoffs), Cap and Trade, National Health Care, Cash For Clunkers, multi-trillion deficits, etc. Not what we were hoping for in our change. In fact, if he had been honest he would have ran on "Hope For Government Money And Change Into Socialism", but honesty apparently isn't his strong suit.

Nothing is worse though than his handling of Nicaragua and Iran. In case you missed, Obama has been decidedly anti-Democracy in both of those countries' cases. One wanted to preserve their Democracy (Nicaragua) and the other started making overtures toward Democracy (Iran). In both cases Obama turned into the Soup Nazi from Seinfeld, and essentially told both nations "NO HOPE AND CHANGE FOR YOU!"

In case you don't know what I am referring to with the Soup Nazi, here is a short video:

Apparently, Obama's hope and change is only for changing America into a socialistic nation, and not allowing other nations to change toward freedom.

Nicaragua had a president that decided he was bigger than the Nicaraguan constitution. He was eyeballing a Hugo Chavez type dictatorship. Nicaraguan's said "no thanks", quietly put him on a plane, and dethroned him peacefully.

Obama's reaction? "NO HOPE AND CHANGE FOR YOU!" Then his administration began to pressure the new administration of Nicaragua to put the dictator-wannabe back into power. Huh? A nation decides to remain free and Obama sides with the dictator?

Then there is Iran. Pseudo-elections were held in June and despite a wave of public outcry, Ahmadinejad, Iran's "president" (really their dictator) fixed the elections so that he would win in a landslide. Iranians reacted by holding mass protests, riots in some case, in a bid to overthrow the dictatorship and bring in Democracy.

Obama's reaction? "NO HOPE AND CHANGE FOR YOU!" Then his administration conveniently ignored the people of Iran and offered no solace. Offered no encouragement. Offered no help in toppling a radical regime with their sights set squarely on nuclear armament. Huh? A nation's people makes a play toward Democracy and Obama sides with the dictator?

Where is the outrage? Can we really have a president that would rather see a dictator remain in power, and a fellow Democracy converted to a dictatorship? Could this really be where we've come as a nation where we turn our backs on the oppressed? That we offer no consolation for those that want and demand freedom?

How anyone can defend Obama after not only what he has pulled in our nation, and then what he has done on the world stage (not just Nicaragua and Iran but his multiple "I am sorry about America" tours), is beyond me. The guy seems bent on destroying the America we all know and love, and his fellow ideologues in the media are content to try and cover for him.

WAKE UP AMERICA! Enough is enough.

Monday, November 23, 2009

Andre Agassi's Open

I finished it last night. Andre Agassi's Open is an incredible read. I found it impossible to put down. I picked it up less than two weeks ago, and even with a hunting trip during that time I managed to read the 385 page autobiography in less than 12 days.

Now admittedly I am a huge Agassi fan. As previously stated on this blog, I identified with him immediately. As a skinny, long-haired kid, it was easy to identify with a skinny, long-haired kid. I always felt somewhat of a kindred spirit with Agassi, but as I read this book the similarities between us were profound.

Agassi is less than a year younger than I am. We both experienced hair loss at a young age, which was exasperated by the fact that we both had our identity tangled up in our long hair. The excerpt of the book where Agassi details shaving his head mirrors my experience in getting my hair cut short for the first time.

I began shaving my head in the summer of 1994 after trying a hairpiece, which I immediately didn't like. Andre used a hairpiece, but in late 1994 was convinced by his girlfriend, Brooke Shields, to ditch the thing and shave his head. Just one of the many weird coincidental parallels between Andre's life and mine.

His early adult love relationship was very similar to my early adult love relationship. Both of our mothers are breast cancer survivors. There are many other parallels, too many to list here actually. Just suffice it to say that I really do identify with Andre on many levels.

Obviously, there are differences. I am devoutly Christian, while I get the sense that religion isn't Andre's thing. He still uses bad language, something I outgrew over a decade and a half ago. He is a Democrat, while I am a staunch conservative. The music Andre listens to I wouldn't be caught dead listening to (Barbra Streisand? Barry Manilow?!? Puke.)

Still, reading the book was a trip down memory lane. So many of the things that he writes about I remember. The matches he describes, I remember watching. Watching him win Wimbledon in 1992. Watching him win 2 U.S. Opens, and lose in the finals of others. The 2001 U.S. Open Quarterfinals against Pete Sampras, which I believe is the greatest tennis match in tennis history. (Sampras won in 4 sets, with all 4 sets going to a tiebreaker.) The incredible win against James Blake in the 2005 U.S. Open. And, of course, his final matches in the 2006 U.S. Open.

The amazing thing to me was that while taking this trip down memory lane, after all these years I got the inside scoop. What was Andre thinking? What advice did he receive from coaches, trainers, friends, and family? Did he really have mental collapses as it appeared to me as a TV viewer? What demons was he fighting? It was fascinating to get that inside scoop. Not only to relive what I remember, but to relive it as Andre told it, in his own words.

I have always admired Andre's philanthropy. One of the most generous athletes of our time, Andre describes in the book how he came to understand that helping others is important in life. It seems to me that here is another difference. While I agree it is important, Andre seems to think it is most important. That, of course, leaves God out of the equation. I only wish Andre could come to a knowledge of the truth of Jesus Christ.

Still, his foundation and his charter school speak volumes about who Andre is. About his heart. Andre is a good guy, deep down. That he has been widely misunderstood for the last 2 decades is a shame. Hopefully this book, Open, can help people see who he really is. That he was just a young kid from Vegas that had talent and the work ethic to become one of the most successful tennis players of all time.

One thing I've discovered is that I was never really a tennis fan. I started watching because I like John McEnroe. I became a huge fan once I discovered Andre. I never could relate to Pete Sampras, he was too boring. Sampras to me was the American version of Ivan Lendl. Since Agassi's retirement in 2006 I haven't watched more than 1 minute of a pro tennis match. It turns out that I was never really a tennis fan, I was an Andre fan.

One of the things he says through the majority of the book is how he really hated tennis. But by the end of his career, Andre didn't want to quit. At the end of the book, he is playing tennis with Steffi (he calls her Stefanie). They have places to go and important things to do, but again he doesn't want to quit playing. By 2007, and for the last few years of his career, he seemed to have finally fallen in love with the game that made him the man he is today.

Other blog entries related to Andre Agassi:

When Old Songs Change Meaning

I remember watching, in horror, in 1995 as the O.J. Simpson verdict was read. Not guilty. How? Everyone knew he did it. Even his own lawyers. The lyrics for Metallica's ...And Justice For All immediately hopped in my head. (Read those lyrics sometime and tell me if they don't perfectly describe the O.J. trial.) Even though the song had been out for 7 years, the O.J. trial gave new meaning to the song.

I had another moment of such clarity on my way to work this morning. I was listening to an album I hadn't listen to in years, Megadeth's 1992 album Countdown To Extinction. One of my favorite songs from that album is Symphony Of Destruction. I will share the lyrics and you can decide for yourself if it is apropos to anything currently going on in our nation.
Symphony Of Destruction lyrics
Songwriters: Mustaine, Dave;

You take a mortal man
And put him in control
Watch him become a god
Watch peoples heads a 'roll
A 'roll, a 'roll

Just like the pied piper
Led rats through the streets
We dance like Marionettes
Swaying to the symphony of destruction

Acting like a robot
It's metal brain corrodes
You try to take its pulse
Before the head explodes
Explodes, explodes

Just like the pied piper
Led rats through the streets
We dance like Marionettes
Swaying to the symphony

Just like the pied piper
Led rats through the streets
We dance like Marionettes
Swaying to the symphony
Swaying to the symphony of destruction

The earth starts to rumble
World powers fall
A warring for the heavens
A peaceful man stands tall
Tall, tall

Just like the pied piper
Led rats through the streets
We dance like Marionettes
Swaying to the symphony

Just like the pied piper
Led rats through the streets
We dance like Marionettes
Swaying to the symphony
Swaying to the symphony of destruction


WHOA. Obama has people swaying to the symphony of destruction. Of course the destruction is of the United States we know and love. Dave Mustaine, the lead singer and songwriter for Megadeth, never intended for this song to talk about Obama. As a left-wing ideologue himself, Mustaine agrees with Obama on almost every issue. Yet he wrote a song, back in 1992, that talks perfectly about Obama as a destroyer of his own nation.

Meanwhile, the Marionettes sway to the symphony of destruction.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

When Conservatives Turn On Conservatives!

Okay, you liberals will love this. Andrew Klavan, the conservative author, takes Rush, Beck, Coulter, and Hannity to task. The conservative movement is collapsing in this video before our very eyes!

Here you go:

Go get 'em Andrew!!

Hat Tip: Neil over at 4 Simpsons

Friday, November 20, 2009

Oops, She Did It Again!

Norah O'Donnell proves her anti-Sarah Palin bias. Again. Here she is in Grand Rapids, MI this week, ambushing a 17 year-old high school student. Here is the video:

And here is a link to this young woman's blog about her run-in with O'Donnell.

Click here: The Day I Met Sarah Palin…and the Liberal Media

O'Donnell should be ashamed of herself. Of course, the liberal mainstream media has no shame. O'Donnell has proven this herself, time and time again. Especially when it comes to Palin. Why do they feel so threatened by Sarah?

Hat tip to theblogprof.

Who Threw The Monkey Wrench Into The Global Warming Machine?

Inquiring minds want to know that. But now climatologists are having to admit that the earth is no longer warming. UH OH! Just when Algore and his minions of mindless automatons were getting traction, along comes real science to disprove their little theory.

Click here: Climatologists Baffled by Global Warming Time-Out

Here are some of the most interesting pieces of the article, with my comments.

The planet's temperature curve rose sharply for almost 30 years, as global temperatures increased by an average of 0.7 degrees Celsius (1.25 degrees Fahrenheit) from the 1970s to the late 1990s. "At present, however, the warming is taking a break," confirms meteorologist Mojib Latif of the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences in the northern German city of Kiel. Latif, one of Germany's best-known climatologists, says that the temperature curve has reached a plateau. "There can be no argument about that," he says. "We have to face that fact."

I love how they can't bring themselves to say "it has stopped". They use phrases like "Time-Out" or "taking a break". As if they are hoping that the warming will resume again. That is the problem with these ideologues: they can't just let the science be what it is, they have to try and bend it to their own agenda.

Speaking of that, there is this from the article:

But a few scientists simply refuse to believe the British calculations. "Warming has continued in the last few years," says Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK). However, Rahmstorf is more or less alone in his view. Hamburg Max Planck Institute scientist Jochem Marotzke, on the other hand, says: "I hardly know any colleagues who would deny that it hasn't gotten warmer in recent years."

You got to love these guys. When temperatures were rising, at a rate of 1.25 degrees Fahrenheit over 30 years mind you, all we heard was chickenlittle, doomsday predictions. But as soon as the science shows that there is no longer any warming occurring, they dismiss the objective, real data, and "simply refuse to believe".

That is the difference in the "global warming believers" and the "global warming deniers". Believers want there to be warming, regardless of the science. Deniers have never denied the data that the earth was warming, they simply pointed out that the actual warming was less than the predicted warming. And that the cause could not be pinpointed to human activities.

"Perhaps we suggested too strongly in the past that the development will continue going up along a simple, straight line. In reality, phases of stagnation or even cooling are completely normal," says Latif.

You think? See this is their problem. They have attributed the warming to greenhouse gas emissions. Yet there are more greenhouse gas emissions today than there were at any point during the warming that occurred from the 1970's through the 1990's. Their hypothesis would suggest that warming should be accelerating, not decelerating, or even stopping altogether.

At a minimum, this lack of warming, or even cooling, proves that this is not a man-made phenomenon. That the earth warms and cools in cycles, regardless of what humans do or don't do, is now apparent. This fact is being met with skepticism for one reason and one reason only: it fails to provide the excuse they need for the radical changes they want to impose.

Algore and his minions were planning on using the fear over human-induced global warming to push through a radical agenda of changes. Carbon credits, fines for emissions, outlawing of internal combustion engines, etc. The lack of this fear that this lack of warming is now allowing for is jeopardizing those initiatives, and they have lost traction. The momentum is now swinging back the other way toward the direction of making sound economic decisions, and no longer worrying about global warming.

In the end, Algore sees the possible end of his meal ticket that he has enjoyed over the last 9 years. Since he lost the 2000 election, Algore has made a significant amount of money in promoting the idea of human-induced global warming. I have a feeling he won't give up that idea until it is pried from his cold (pun intended), dead hands.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

John Conyers Is Stupid

To set this up you need to watch this video:

Click here for video: Dem Conyers Makes A Very Stupid Statement

Now it seems that everyone is concentrating on this statement:

"I'm getting tired of saving Obama's can in the White House"

Small potatoes. Seriously, that is minor compared to this next doozy.

"The public option.....which is the only way you'll manage costs and give some competition to 1300 other health insurance companies...."

Did he really just say that? Did he even hear what he said? This guy gets elected despite being about as smart as a piece of paper. And he marries very badly as well (if you are ever bored, do a google search on his wife, former Detroit Councilwoman Monica Conyers).

First of all, Johnny, the only way to manage costs is through competition. The public option has nothing to do with free market competition. The public option is a step towards a single payer system. The same system that is failing all over the world.

Secondly, 1300 other insurance companies are the VERY DEFINITION OF COMPETITION! How does this doofus not understand that? Instead of trying to get a public option, what your bill should be doing is making it easier for those 1300 insurance companies to compete with one another in each and every state in the nation! That is how you generate competition. Creating a government run, 1301st insurance company does nothing to generate more competition.

This is the essence of what we are up against in this fight. Elected officials that do not understand simple economic principles. Elected officials that think that government is the solution to all our problems, instead of realizing that government IS the problem.

Until voters toss out idiots like Conyers we will be stuck with the problems that exist today, with no real possibility for solutions in the future.

When You Bad Mouth My Wife Or Mother I Get Angry

Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:
Ephesians 4:26

This is a tough scripture for me. I have always had a bit of a temper. It is like a pressure-cooker. It builds slowly, but if the pressure doesn't get released it might explode. As I have aged I have learned to control my anger much better. I've realized that reacting angrily in most situations is counterproductive: it doesn't change anything, and then I have to deal with the fallout of my outburst on top of the original situation.

So now I try to be angry and sin not. Being angry is not wrong in and of itself, it is what you do with that anger.

One area that I struggle with today is Sarah Palin. From the time I started to get to know Sarah after her being named John McCain's running mate, I began to identify with her. She was like my wife. She was like my mother. She was like most of the women in my life that I care about (aunts, cousins, sisters, sisters-in-Christ, etc). I felt like we finally had a woman in the national political spotlight that was representative of the women that I know and love. Unlike Nancy Pelosi, and Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Barbara Boxer, Sarah was smart, articulate, and passionately conservative.

Then the badmouthing started. At first it didn't bother me, most election are like this. The opposing candidate and his VP running mate bad mouth your candidate and his running mate. But then it turned ugly.

I had a coworker start referring to Sarah as a "dumb -female dog-". I had another coworker, and ardent Obama supporter, saying that with McCain's age it scared her that Sarah could be one heartbeat away from the presidency. (Note: Community organizer Obama, Crazy Joe Biden, and Nancy The Wicked Witch Pelosi did nothing to bother her, despite that being the proposed chain of ascension).

I had a "friend" that badmouthed her, and when I told him that she reminded me of my wife his response was "no offense, but I don't want your wife as president or vice president, either". Really? Well I don't want you and your wife to set foot in my house ever again. (Sorry, like I said I get angry related to this topic!)

The truth is that when someone would badmouth Sarah Palin, in my eyes they were badmouthing my mom, my wife, and all the women in my life that I mentioned previously. Disagree with them all you like. Hate their pro-life stance, their religious beliefs, or even their hair style and glasses frames. No problem. Start calling them "dumb -female dog-", or stupid, or belittling their character and I turn into a rabid dog.

I mentioned this to the aforementioned coworkers, that it feels like they are belittling the women I care about because those women are very similar to Sarah. The reaction is not good. The ardent pro-Obama supporter, who also happens to be black, starts saying "I feel the same about Obama, when you badmouth him you are badmouthing all black people". Interesting, since I had never said anything about Obama the person, only his policies and beliefs. The distinction is lost completely on this "intellectual" of a coworker. (Note, she also a few days before this discussion was expounding on how Obama really wasn't very "black". Her words, not mine.)

The fact is that these Democrats couldn't badmouth Sarah's beliefs. They had to try to attack her very foundation as a person. "She shoots wolves from helicopters! Surely you don't support that." Actually I do. The wolf population in Alaska has to be controlled, this method of control predates Sarah Palin.

"She is a traitor to her gender." Why? Because she believes in the right that an unborn human has to life? I, and the women in my life, disagree with that. They think that any woman that would willingly rip that unborn child from their womb, and/or support others' rights to do so, is a traitor to their gender. At the least a traitor to motherhood.

All this has been bubbling and percolating in me for well over a year. Then yesterday I read this article:

Click here: AP Turns Heads for Devoting 11 Reporters to Palin Book 'Fact Check'

As the Drudge Report points out, they didn't even bother assigning 1 reporter to fact check Obama's book. I feel the anger returning.

Then I read a paragraph from the article like this: "Biden's book "Promises to Keep" became an instant best-seller when he was chosen to be Obama's running mate, but was not fact-checked by the AP and only received passing interest. In a story last year on Biden's Vietnam War draft deferments due to asthma, the reporter notes Biden didn't mention the malady in his book."

Breathe slowly in and out. Inhale through your nose, exhale through your mouth.

The media's treatment of Sarah for
the last 13 months has been unconscionable. I will never trust the mainstream media again. If ever there was a bias shown by the MSM, never was it more apparent than with Palin. From Charlie Goofball Gibson's loaded, ambushing questions, to Katie The Troll Couric's creative editing, the media proved that they had an axe to grind, and they were sharpening it at the expense of the character of a good, decent woman.

Sarah got the Dan Quayle treatment to the power of infinity. Heaven forbid she ever add the letter e to the end of a word like potato. The liberal-dominated media will always form a wagon circle around any candidate or politician they see as a threat. They want no more Ronald Reagans to render them powerless.

Since 1988 they have slowly advanced a leftist agenda in the vacuum that Reagan's absence left. They want to make sure no Quayle, nor Palin, nor any other true conservative ever step on all that they hold dear, which is everything America is the opposite of. So they cut these conservatives' legs out from under them before they can build any momentum.

In the meantime, we get a far-left, extremist, ideologue like Obama elected to the presidency. And no one better question him or you will be silenced with the label of racist applied across your forehead. What have we let our nation become?

Bad mouth Sarah, and you're walking on the fighting side of me.

Friday, November 13, 2009

Voting For Better People Works!

Imagine this. Obama has now done a 180 on cap-and-trade. Here is the story:

Click here: After spending binge, White House says it will focus on deficits

Here is my favorite part of the story:
The president's plan, which the officials said was under discussion before this month’s Democratic election setbacks, represents both a practical and a political calculation by this White House.

On the political side, Obama can help moderate Democrats avoid some tough votes in an election year and, perhaps more importantly, calm the nerves of independent voters who are voicing big concerns with the big spending and deficits.
That first part is a lie. No way would they be talking about dropping this legislation if Democrats had done well in this month's elections. The fact that two Democratic governors got blown out, and Democrats struggled in other areas as well, is what is driving this.

Voting out people that have left-wing agendas will force those that remain who hold to those same agendas to take notice. This is what was so great about these elections: they foretell what 2010's elections could have in store.

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama need to take a look at this month's elections and realize that they are in danger of losing their majority in 2010. That could have two effects.
  1. It could cause them to try and push through their radical agenda while they do have the majority. Or,
  2. It could cause them to temper their plans to try to make them appear less extreme.
The first option is risky at best. Their majority could collapse if moderate Democrats get cold feet and pull out of extreme initiatives like public health care, or cap and trade. The second option could work, but if not done properly it could still backfire. For instance, pushing through a public option in health care, even done at the same time as dropping cap and trade, could still draw the ire of independents and cause an anti-Democrat backlash in 2010.

No doubt the Democratic leadership will continue to push for radical, liberal legislation. To what extent they push, and how many types of legislation they push, will be interesting to witness in the year to come.

Still, this is proof that voting for better candidates, whether they be moderate or conservative Democrats or conservative Republicans, can only have a positive effect. The American people need to take notice of the effect this election is having and continue to vote accordingly in the elections to come.

Nancy Pelosi Wishes She Looked This Good

Seems Apple is a tad touchy. They recently rejected an App for the iPhone submitted by a conservative filmmaker because they said it ridiculed public figures. At issue were caricatures of congress people, like this one of Nancy Pelosi:

Since Apple didn't want you to see this picture, I figured I'd put it up on my blog so you could!

Here is the whole story: Apple's Rejection of iPhone App Showing Political Caricatures Rankles Creator

Just one more reason I can't stand Apple.
Click here:

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Despite Their Claims After The 2000 Election, Democrats Are The Ones That Steal Elections

NY23 was conceded by the Conservative candidate, Doug Hoffman, on election night. He made the decision to concede based on the information that he had received: he was down 5,335 votes with 93% of the vote counted, and was only up 500 votes in his stronghold of Oswego County.

Turns out he was actually up 1,748 votes in Oswego, and trailed by only roughly 3,000 votes with 93% of the vote counted. And the absentee ballots that are still coming are expected to swing to Hoffman.

It should be noted, that liberal, socialist Democrat Bill Owens very well may still end up legitimately winning the election, but Democrats love to try to swing elections anyway they can. Remember the liberal MSM calling Florida in 2000 even though there were still precincts in Florida's panhandle open to voting? The effects of that have never been studied.

So Hoffman conceded on election night thinking he had no chance, and now he may still have had a chance over a week later. Tricky, tricky Democrats getting him to concede on election night.

You can read more about this at:

Click here: Recanvassing shows NY-23 race tightens even as Rep. Bill Owens is sworn into House seat

Michigan Senator Debbie Stabenow Spreading Health Care Lies On The Paul W. Smith Show

StabMeNow was on Smith's show on WJR this morning. Amazingly she threw out "facts" and "figures" with no documented evidence as to their accuracy. She was in major spin mode. She dodged, she parried, she tried to show compassion when she had none. It was sickening.

I would have respected her more if she'd just come out and said "yes, we want to control your health care". Her fence-sitting is notorious. She rarely takes a true stance on issues. She tries to agree with everyone verbally, then votes as an extreme left-wing, liberal. She isn't even an ideologue, she is the puppet of ideologues.

Michigan voters should be ashamed of themselves for electing someone this inept.

You can hear her lies for yourself at this link:

Click here: Debbie Stabenow lies through her false teeth on the Paul W. Smith Show

Book: Onward Christan Athlete

Yesterday Michael Medved had the author of this new book on his show. Click here: Michael Medved Show The book's title is a tad misleading. This is actually a book that is belittling Christian athletes for using their position to push Christian beliefs. Especially the belief that Jesus Christ is THE way, THE truth, and THE life, and that no one cometh to the father but by Him. (John 14:6)

The author, Tom Krattenmaker, spent a lot of time on the Medved show talking about being a Christian progressive, and wanting to change Christianity into a religion that accepts all beliefs. By accepting he means that he doesn't want Christians to preach that Christ is the only way to salvation. Why is he even a Christian?

I must say, one thing I have never liked is when an athlete acts like it was God that caused his team to win. My belief is that God isn't really concerned about the outcome of a sporting event. Now, if the athlete wants to thank God for the talent He gave the athlete, that is fine. But to believe that God had a direct hand in the outcome, I think, is misguided.

Krattenmaker, in his call to Medved, took former NFL head coach Tony Dungy to task for supporting the Biblical definition of marriage. He felt Dungy should have supported homosexual marriage DESPITE Dungy's Christian beliefs. This is where liberal Christians (that is an oxymoron) lose integrity. You can't claim to be a Christian and go against the teachings of Christ.

Christ is clear: He is the only way to salvation, and marriage is between one man and one woman for life. Krattenmaker's willingness to compromise those teachings makes him an anti-Christ, not a Christian. He'd probably find that offensive but I don't care. Christ is clear in the scripture that you are either for Him or against Him. You can't be for Him and be against his teachings. Therefore Krattenmaker is against Him.

The idea that athletes cannot be true to their Christian beliefs is idiotic. Krattenmaker has no problem with liberal stars, in sports or any other pop-culture, espousing their liberal views publicly. But he thinks Christian athletes need to remain quiet about true Christian theology. (And I am not talking about the false doctrine version of Christianity that Krattenmaker preaches.)

Krattenmaker also spoke about a Major League Baseball team's chaplain (sorry, I don't remember the team) that was asked a direct question in a team Christian study. A Christian player asked the volunteer chaplain: "is my Jewish ex-girlfriend going to hell?" The chaplain, using scripture, showed the player that unless she accepts Jesus Christ and His teachings then she was in danger of being lost. Krattenmaker supported the team's decision to dismiss the volunteer chaplain for giving this answer.

Krattenmaker seemed appalled that one would think their religion was the only truth. Medved, who is Jewish, said he had no problem with the CHRISTIAN chaplain teaching Christianity. Medved's stance was that the chaplain was moved by his faith to do what he did because his beliefs instructed him to do so.

Krattenmaker obviously has no true concept of religion, sin, and redemption. You can't be a true Christian and think that people that deny Christ, which those that practice Judaism do, are saved. The whole point of Christianity is that Christ is the Messiah! By extension, true followers of Judaism have to think that Christians are lost because, in their estimation, Christians are following a false messiah! Krattenmaker doesn't seem to understand the basic tenets of the religions he discusses.

I don't mean to bash Krattenmaker as I am sure he is sincere in his beliefs. I just think those beliefs are grossly misguided, as is the basic theme behind his entire book.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

NBC Wants To Brainwash You

Environwhackos have run a muck since I was child. I didn't realize that until my wife brought home the DVD of ABC's Schoolhouse Rock from the library for my daughter to watch. My wife was feeling nostalgic and she remembered being a kid and watching the shorts on Saturday mornings.

I was shocked at the number of environmentally whacked out themes in Schoolhouse Rock. I guess they were lost on me as a child. I have had several discussions with my daughter on why some people feel the need to worship the earth, and put it above all else.

Then I read this story:

Click here: NBC enlists prime-time programs in green message

The old propaganda tactic: if people won't submit to your way of thinking then bombard them with the message until they concede. This sickens me to the point where I am glad that I do not watch network television programming. This kind of thing would drive me nuts.

NBC is allowed to use entertainment programming to program the minds of viewers. Yet the Obama administration is going after Special K cereal because Kellogg has made claims that eating the cereal can have health benefits. So I think I see what Obama is up to. Mislead people toward his line of thinking, that's okay. Mislead people away from his line of thinking, he'll use the powers of the federal government to go after you.

NBC should be ashamed of themselves. People do not tune in to television shows to be bombarded with political messages. They tune in to shows to escape real life and be entertained. I'd love to see this backfire and for NBC's ratings to tank.

Maybe that would be the final nail in General Electric (owner of NBC) CEO Jeff Immelt's coffin. Immelt has taken a business that Jack Welch built up, and is tearing it down piece by piece. GE is allowing NBC to brainwash people while they are entertaining them. That is unconscionable.

Chinese Artist Unveils "Burning Man Obama" Sculpture

Wow. Not sure what to say about this. Reuters puts it thusly:

"A sculpture by Chinese artist Liu Bolin titled "Burning Man Obama" is tested at a workshop in Beijing November 11, 2009. The sculpture represents U.S. President Barack Obama's impact on the world."

Burning impact on the world? Maybe this is an appropriate expression of art! After all, at a minimum, Obama is burning our nation, the voters that supported him, and all of us that pay taxes.

I think this was meant as a compliment. I see it as more a statement on his idiotic policies.

Moron Of The Week: Chicago Mayor Daley

13 people dead. 30 others wounded. Who is to blame for this senseless act of violence?

According to Chicago Mayor, "Moron" Daley, it was "American's love of guns".

Click here: Big Government: Chicago Mayor Daley blames Ft. Hood on America's love of guns

Really? I thought Ft. Hood was because of a hatred of America by an Islamic jihadist. Guess I was wrong.

Chicago is not known for its modern day, intelligent politicians. It seems like every politician from Chicago and Illinois these days is a corrupt moron. Barack Obama is exhibit A. Rod Blagojevich is exhibit B. And I now present Richard Daley as exhibit C. Abraham Lincoln is rolling in his grave over these three.

One Muslim Died For His Crimes, Another Is Out Of His Coma

I remember the 2002 D.C. area shootings very well. I remember even hearing the news accounts of the fear these shootings caused while vacationing in St. Thomas. When they finally caught John Allen Muhammad and Lee Malvo, and brought them to justice, there was nationwide relief especially in the D.C. area.

With 9/11, the anthrax mailings, and then the D.C. sniper case, the sense of unease in our nation was palpable. Since late 2002, that unease had given way to a sense of security once again. After 7 years, without a major incident of Islamo-terrorism on our own soil, we once again were lulled into feeling secure in our own nation.

All that blew up in our face last week when an Islamic jihadist shot and killed 13, and wounded 30 others, at Ft. Hood in Texas. Coincidentally, less than a week later, another Muslim shooter was executed for his crimes 7 years ago.

Click here: Defiant DC sniper mastermind Muhammad executed

Now there are reports that Ft. Hood shooter, Nidal Malik Hasan, is awake and talking. If true, I long for the day when he too will face justice for the crimes he has committed.

I am often asked how I can be for the death penalty, and be a Christian. To me the answer is easy: God authorizes government to exercise judgment and justice, including the death penalty. The details for that are for a different day, but that is how I believe.

That our nation has to fight Islamo-terrorists abroad and at home is a sad reality. Maybe this cry of political correctness that the left has been crying since 9/11 will go away. Sometimes profiling is necessary, and as details of Hasan and his past continue to leak, it is apparent that this guy should have been under surveillance.

On another note, yesterday I had a very liberal coworker expressing her consternation over why Hasan wasn't under surveillance. "Someone should be in trouble for this!" she exclaimed. I bit my tongue. I have known her for nearly 3 years, and she has spent that time bashing Bush and Cheney for the patriot act. Her and her ilk should share in that "trouble".

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Andre Agassi, A Couple Of Weeks Later

It has been a couple of weeks since Andre Agassi came out with details, from his new autobiography, of his use of crystal meth. My initial reaction to this confession can be found at this link:

Click here: Sometimes You Have To Deal With Difficult Subjects

Now that some time has passed it has become clear that Andre is very sorry for the decision that he made. I came to this realization after watching his interview with Katie Couric for 60 Minutes. You can view that at this link:

Click here: Andre Agassi interview on 60 Minutes

I found Andre in this interview to be very penitent. The remorse comes through in his words and in his expression. This is a man that has been pained with his decision to use a drug, and then to lie about its use.

The most telling part for me was when he said: "In life most bad decisions lead to more bad decisions..."

I wrote that very thing two weeks ago upon learning about all of this. Sometimes when we get caught in a sin we lie about that sin. Read the book of Genesis about Cain's killing of his brother Abel. When God confronts Cain, Cain lies that he doesn't know where his brother is. He utters the infamous words: "Am I my brother's keeper?"

Of course we are our brother's keepers. That involves many things. Andre in this interview asks for compassion. I give him that as a brother in the human-race. He made a mistake, as we all have. He has finally owned up to that mistake, unlike most of us.

As Andre points out, this is not about a performance-enhancing drug. In fact, this hurt his tennis not helped it. For Martina Navratilova and others to suggest that he needs to be stripped of his titles, or for him to willingly give them up, is preposterous. To look at him as someone that turned his life around after a horrible decision would be better.

Andre probably should have come clean back in 1997, took the punishment that was coming to him, and lived with the consequences. Like most of us he chose to try and take an easy way out. He has had to live with this secret for 12 years. I feel that he has been punished enough by carrying that burden.

I will be buying Andre's book, Open, and reading it.

Visit Certain News Sites? Obama Wants To Know

Big Brother Obama wants to know what news sites you visit. And he is having the justice department subpoena news sites to find out.

Click here: Justice Dept. Asked For News Site's Visitor Lists

This is scary stuff. And this is from the crowd that accused Bush of reading our private email! Obama and his followers would have had us believe that Bush and Cheney personally read billions of private emails a day. From 2002-2008, I heard a liberal a day complain about the violation of our constitutional rights.

Now suddenly no one complains about Obama violating those rights. And this administration is upping the ante by getting private news sites to turn over their visitor's lists. Where is the outrage?

You'd think the MSM would be pitching a fit over this one. But I guess since it is The One's justice department now then anything they want to do is okay. Just further proof that the MSM is in bed with this administration.

A Week After Senate Panel Approves Climate Bill: October Third Coldest On Record

Talk about an inconvenient truth. As the earth continues its cooling trend that threatens our existence (sarcasm), the environ-whackos continue to beat the chickenlittle drum of global warming. Yet here is another fact showing the earth is in a cooling trend:

Click here: NOAA: October 3rd coolest on record

Yet the MSM, Obama, the Democrats, and other left-wing whackos will continue to preach cap-and-trade, limiting emissions, not eating beef, and any other psycho proposal they think they can get traction with by using the fear induced by global warming.

That is really what this boils down to. They have an agenda and they want to use global warming to scare people into supporting that agenda. My post of the Louder With Crowder video about a new documentary showed that: Not Evil, Just Wrong

Algore is not interested in facts. He doesn't want the evidence to get in the way of the hysteria. Never mind that the polar ice hasn't melt, as they predicted. Never mind that polar bears have actually increased in numbers instead of heading closer to extinction. No, none of those facts matter to the Algore ilk, they want to pass legislation they like and they think global warming fear can help them do that.

So next time some uninformed lunk-head tries to tell you that the earth is warming and we are all going to die, just tell them that the evidence doesn't support that, and that their chickenlittle routine won't work on you. When we stop listening then maybe they will shut-up.

Monday, November 09, 2009

SURPRISE!!! Islamoterrorist Wannabe Army Major Tried To Contact al Qaeda!

The MSM media has been in full spin mode ever since a Muslim Army Major, Nidal Hasan, went on a shooting spree at Ford Hood and killed 13 people, and wounded dozens of others. The MSM has tried hard to make this about the military and the stresses of the Iraq war and have tried to downplay Hasan's Muslim background.

Then came word last week that Hasan shouted "Allahu Akbar" as he opened fire. The MSM downplayed that, tried to explain it away, or outright ignored it. Then this weekend came this report:

Click here: Officials: U.S. Aware of Hasan Efforts to Contact al Qaeda

Oops. That this was anything but an inside terrorist attack is now all but apparent. So how will the White House handle this? Obama already botched the handling of this attack.

Click here to read Writer X's take: Shout-outs

The MSM's handling of this thing has been terrible. But it pales in comparison to Obama's handling of it. It is almost as if Obama is more compassionate toward the Muslim terrorist than he is to the military and those that lost their lives in this attack. Surely not, right?

You decide. Read this, click here: Fort Hood Terrorist: Allahu Akbar! Obama: Let's Not Jump To Conclusions

Huh? This is the guy that says we have to have health care reform NOW. This is the guy that says we have to have cap and trade legislation NOW. This is the guy that buys into global warming wholeheartedly despite growing proof that it is a crock. This is a guy that goes out to the Muslim world and gives interviews and speeches. But on this issue we have to "not jump to conclusions".

It is time to face the fact that Obama is at best a Muslim sympathizer, and at worst a secret Muslim himself. I know the MSM has painted people that think the latter as whackos. And many on the right have even bought into that thinking as well. But as time goes on, I myself am beginning to wonder if our president isn't a Muslim.

Then again, the MSM will rush to try to prevent connections to Islamo-terrorism and someone like Hasan. Why wouldn't they offer the same protections to the president that they worked so hard to get elected?

I am not sure if our country can take another 3 years of this guy (Obama).

UPDATE!! Moonbattery has an excellent post up on this issue! Click here: MSM Empathizes with Stressed Out Jihadist

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Senate Panel Approves Bill To Combat Something That Doesn't Exist

Click here: Senate Panel Approves Democratic Global Warming Bill

Unbelievable. I think next they should approve a treaty with the Smurfs. I think they should legislate an open season for unicorns. They should approve new IRS tax laws regarding Leprechauns and their pots of gold. They should make sure the tooth fairy and Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny are abiding by federal privacy laws. They should make sure that dwarves, elves, and gnomes are protected under federal hate crimes legislation. And they should make sure that flying carpets are held to the same safety standards as airplanes and passenger ground vehicles.

This is why the congress approval rating is in the single digits. Global warming is a farce. The earth cools and warms due to natural processes. Nothing we are doing is causing that cycle to change. The evidence continues to mount proving that changes in the earth's temperature are not human induced. And more and more scientists are going on record stating that fact.

Look at yesterday's post regarding the movie Not Evil, Just Wrong. That movie exposes the lies about global warming, and shows the dire effects that the fight against global warming will have.

This move by congress reminds me of some of the decisions made by politicians in the book Atlas Shrugged. Short-sighted. Ineffective. Causing more harm than good. This is just further proof that in 2010 we need a complete overhaul of both houses. "Throw The Bums Out" should be the mantra. If a single incumbent that voted for something like this, or the upcoming health care legislation, is reelected, then the constituents in their jurisdiction should be examined by a psychiatrist.

Enough is enough.

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Not Evil, Just Wrong: The True Cost of Global Warming Hysteria

I do disagree a bit. I think Algore is evil AND wrong. But still this film looks very interesting. Exposing Algore's lies. Showing how Algore profits. Showing how the science does not support the theory.

Also, check this out from Louder With Crowder

Algore doesn't like questions!

VA and NJ Were Messages, But Will Those Messages Be Received?

I know conservatives and Republicans (surprise! they are not the same) are celebrating the gubernatorial victories in Virginia and New Jersey. And after the last two national elections they have every right to be happy about the results from these local elections. However, the idea that this sends a message to the White House and Washington needs to be toned down.

The reason this needs to be tempered is that Democrats do not get messages. Ideologues are not deterred by inconsequential things like election results and the will of the people. (Just look at the anti-gay marriage constitutional amendment in California!) Democrats, almost always liberal ideologues, will not let this election, nor the national, off year election of 2010 derail them from their agenda.

Democrats spin election results. "We didn't run the right candidiates." "We didn't spend enough money." "We didn't do a good enough job getting the message out." When Democrats look at the results in races like New Jersey, where Obama campaigned several times, they don't get the message that people are fed up with Obama. They merely think that if he went there 7 times, then he should have gone there 14 times. If the incumbent Democrat out spent his opponent by $10 million, and still lost, then he should have out spent him by $20 million.

Democrats always think they lost because their own message wasn't loud enough. If they had 5 Keith Olbermanns on 5 CNNs spouting the party line every night and still lost, then they should shoot for 10 Keith Olbermanns on 10 CNNs spouting the party line every night. When Democrats lose elections they just start shouting louder.

Conservatives that are hopeful that these election results will bring down things like the public option in health care reform, or cap and trade legislation are delusional. Democrats never think their policies are unpopular just that they haven't been presented properly. "If people just knew how much better these policies would be for them then they wouldn't be against them." Or they blame Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Fox News, for misleading people about what their policies. Obama has said so much himself!

So the Democrats will not change. They won't change direction. They'll play dirtier now. They'll get more of their rich and famous friends involved in campaigns. They'll get more of their rich and famous friends to donate money. They'll smear the names of good conservatives (think Sarah Palin in 2008) in order to get ahead. They'll jump on the bandwagon against a cause they once supported and make it all the fault of Republicans (think Iraq in 2006 and 2008). Democrats don't become nicer when they lose, they become meaner.

Dictator Obama, Wicked Witch Pelosi, and Darth Vader Harry Reid are probably behind closed doors as we speak, plotting a devious plan to thwart the will of the American people, and to try and get them to unwittingly back their evil plans once again. Democrats don't get messages, they merely see messages as setbacks to their ultimate goals of world domination.

"I'll get you my pretties! And your little country too!"

UPDATE: Pelosi: "We won last night!"

Told you.

Tuesday, November 03, 2009

Why People Hate Unions

Here is a perfect example of why many people no longer relate to labor unions:

Click here: UAW won't renegotiate after Ford deal fails

A little background. The concessions that the UAW membership rejected are concessions that UAW workers at Chrysler and GM have already accepted. Essentially what Ford workers did was to vote to keep Ford from being competitive with GM and Chrysler, as well as all of the foreign automakers, in the future.

This is exactly why many were predicting that if GM or Chrysler filed for bankruptcy, the other two companies would have to follow suit. There is no way that one or two of them could go without the union concessions that would result for the company (or companies) that did file. So what the UAW has done here is pretty much guarantee that Ford will have to file for bankruptcy in the future.

The truth is now known that the reason for the demise of the Big Three was a direct result of the UAW, and their nefarious demands over the years. Ford, GM, and Chrysler were forced to accept those demands, separately. Any thought of them collectively balking would have resulted in collusion charges, and, no doubt, lawsuits. Meantime, the union workers at all three companies could collectively bargain without any charge of collusion. That's fair, right?

Now the UAW points to Ford's $1 billion dollar profit as a sign that Ford doesn't need the same concessions that GM and Chrysler received. What the short-sighted UAW membership fails to remember is that it was a relatively short time ago that both Chrysler and GM were also profitable. This is exactly the kind short-sighted union thinking that resulted in GM and Chrysler having to file for bankruptcy.

Never mind facts like this being Ford's first profitable quarter in their North American operations since the 1st quarter of 2005. No, this quarter's profits, no doubt boosted by Cash For Clunkers, is proof that Ford doesn't need the same concessions as the other two. Right.

The UAW only needs to look at the NHL's labor strife from a few years ago to see what kind of precipice they have placed themselves on the edge of. Just like the NHL players realized, Ford employees need to realize that a few concessions now could go a long way toward ensuring their jobs in the future. But no, they'd rather reject concessions now and risk everyone's job in the future.

That is really intelligent.

UPDATE: theblogprof has an excellent post up on this issue. As he points out, the UAW owns GM and, therefore, has a conflict of interest in turning down these concessions with Ford!!

Monday, November 02, 2009

OOPS! Clinton Statue Making Unpopular Gesture!

Is it just me or does this new statue of Bill Clinton, unveiled in Kosovo yesterday, look a little, ummm, "Nazi-ish"?

Maybe that is why he isn't smiling. ZEIG HEIL!