Follow Me On Twitter!

Thursday, December 09, 2010

Aaron Sorkin Is An Idiot

Aaron Sorkin has given us some of the most idiotic things in the world. First there is The West Wing. A far-left political drama so far-fetched that even fans of the show secretly laugh at it. Then there is The Social Network. 'Nuf said.

Now Aaron has doubled down on his idiocy and produced a turd so gigantic that even his fans will have to admit that he is an idiot.

Click here: Aaron Sorkin brands Sarah Palin TV show 'a snuff film'

Sorkin apparently has jumped on the liberal bandwagon that has attacked Palin over the hunting of an elk on the last episode of her show. Palin responded to the controversy thusly:
"Unless you've never worn leather shoes, sat upon a leather chair or eaten meat, save your condemnation."
Sorkin apparently feels morally superior to Palin because he chooses to have other people do his killing. His response to Palin's response went a little something like this:
"I eat meat, chicken and fish, have shoes and furniture made of leather ... I'm able to make a distinction between you and me without feeling the least bit hypocritical,"
So not feeling hypocritical apparently makes one completely non-hypocritical. So, for instance, while Algore is out jetting around the world preaching environmentalism, while having the biggest carbon footprint on the planet, as long as he doesn't feel hypocritical then he apparently isn't.

Let's apply Sorkin's logic to other areas. A KKK member that doesn't feel racist, isn't? A murderer that doesn't feel like a murderer, isn't? How about a rapist that doesn't feel like a rapist? He must not be according to Aaron Sorkin.

See, Sorkin makes the typical liberal moral grab here. Simply declaring himself non-hypocritical makes him so. So he can actually be guilty of anything, but simply say he isn't and he thinks people should take that at face value.

What Sorkin is really saying is that allowing others to do your dirty work, like the killing of the animals that he uses in his daily life, is superior than doing the dirty work yourself. Huh? Is that really logical? Next time one of my handy carpenter friends remodels a room of his home I will claim superiority on him by telling him I am going to pay someone do something similar in my home. Would that really make me superior?

I suggest Aaron Sorkin take a big dose of reality, swallow his feigned pride, and volunteer to go hunting on Palin's show to take down a big game animal. Field dress it. Process it. Then if after all that his appreciation for the meat, chicken, fish and leather products he uses each day doesn't multiply he will be the most inhumane human-being on the face of the planet.

You see Aaron, when you have others do your dirty work for you, you don't really understand all that goes into getting that meat, chicken, fish, and leather to you. It becomes a product, not a natural commodity that must be harvested. Palin is superior to Sorkin because she understands what it takes to provide all those things. Instead of sitting in a Hollywood palace having those things delivered by servants, and then looking down her nose at those that do the dirty work.

In the end it is the elitist mentality at play here for Sorkin. He'll gladly use the products that others provide from animals without ever lifting a finger to partake in the harvesting of those products. Sorkin should be thanking Palin, and all those that do this type of work on a daily basis, instead of belittling and attacking them.


dcgirl said...

You are right on. His comments are similar to a person that hires a hitman and then claims not to be a murder.

daniel noe said...

I am superior because I feel superior. This ability is not open to you because I don't feel you are superior. lol.

Anonymous said...

It makes me sad that you seem to have nothing better to do than defend a simpleton like Palin and condemn a brilliant writer.

LoneWolfArcher said...

Ahh the anonymous lob and run commenter. Love those. Did you read my post? What specifically are you taking exception to? What did I say that you find fault with? Or are you just reacting to your irrational hatred for Palin?