Follow Me On Twitter!

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

The Theory Of Evolution Is Based On Racism

While studying the claim that the theory of evolution has a basis in racism, I came across this article:

Click here: Skin Color: Handy Tool for Teaching Evolution

So notice a few things about evolution:
  • It is believed that man's origins began in Africa
  • Early man was dark skinned and covered in hair
  • As we evolved we lost the hair
  • As we migrated out of Africa we evolved into fairer skinned people
Wait a minute? So evolutionists believe that lighter-skinned people are further evolved than dark skinned people? That sure is what it sounds like. Wouldn't arguing that one race is more evolved than another be teaching that one race is superior to another? It sure sounds like it.

Now notice what creationists believe.

  • God created Adam and Eve
  • All people of all races are descendants of Adam and Eve
  • All are equal in God's sight (Romans 2:11)
Interesting isn't it?

The article is correct in one aspect, and that is why people of different skin colors were dispersed about the earth. Those in sunnier climates tend to be darker because of the folate problems that lighter skinned people have in those climates. And lighter skinned people do better in less sunny environments because of the vitamin D problem this would have posed for darker skinned people.

But to suggest that light skinned people are further evolved is pure racism and has no part being taught to our kids.

Monday, July 25, 2011

Obama IS A Fascist

In his own words.

Click here: Obama: 'I need a dance partner' on immigration reform

Here is the quote:
"The idea of doing things on my own is very tempting. I promise you, not just on immigration reform. But that's not how our system works. That's not how our democracy functions. That's not how our Constitution is written," Obama said at the National Council of La Raza's annual conference.
Yep, he'd love to be king instead of president.

Powerful, Motivating, Thought-Provoking. Dr. Brad Harrub Hosts Seminar At Church

So this weekend my church put on a seminar featuring Dr. (and Brother) Brad Harrub from Focus Press. The topics he spoke on were:

  • Can We Prove God Exists?
  • Intelligent Design or Ape-like Creature?
  • The Dinosaur Dilemma
  • Is the Bible Just a Good Book?
  • Faith for Life (7 Reasons We are Losing our Children)
  • Mt. St. Helens, the Grand Canyon, and the Age of the Earth

All I can say is: WOW. It was so uplifting, so encouraging, and so informative. Never again do I have to be intimidated when an evolutionist asks "what about the Grand Canyon?". Never again do I have to be clueless when someone asks about strata layers. I have been armed with information to defend creationism and a young earth.

To hear Brother Harrub deliver such incredible scientific information showing the validity of the Bible, and then to hear him speak so heartfelt about spirituality was incredibly motivating. Brother Harrub continued to make the point that saving the souls of our children should be our number one priority, and I agree.

Check out Focus Press and the materials the materials they have available. Brother Harrub's book Convicted should be required reading for all Christian families.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Obama's Joke Telling The Worst Ever

Click here for story: Obama Tries Telling Joke, Falls Flat

I love that he has to tell everyone that it was a joke. Though I am still unsure if he meant the joke he just told, or if he was referring to the last 2 1/2 years.

Friday, July 15, 2011

Obama's New Ploy? Make It Up As You Go!

Barack Obama is liar. We all knew that. But now his lies are going from the mildly misleading to out-and-out whopper of all lies.

In case you missed it, Obama made an incredibly exaggerated claim.

Click here for story: Obama: Public is 'sold' on tax increases in a debt-ceiling deal
"The American people are sold," he said. "The problem is members of Congress are dug in ideologically."

Obama said 80 percent of Americans are on his side in the debate over what to include in the debt package. Voters are paying attention to "who seems to be trying to get something done," the president said. "It's going to be in the interests of everybody who wants to serve in this town to make sure they are on the right side of that impression."
Amazing. Now for some time I have claimed that Obama thinks that the American people are stupid. That he can say anything he wants and people will blindly believe it. That may have been the case in eras past, but this is the internet era.

When a politician makes a claim like this, all you have to do is start googling it. The truth will be made known. For instance, here is a poll taken on the issue:

Click here for story: 55% Oppose Tax Hike In Debt Ceiling Deal
Just 34% think a tax hike should be included in any legislation to raise the debt ceiling. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 55% disagree and say it should not. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
There is a huge partisan divide on the question. Fifty-eight percent (58%) of Democrats want a tax hike in the deal while 82% of Republicans do not. Among those not affiliated with either major political party, 35% favor a tax hike and 51% are opposed.

Even if you claim that Rasmussen is wildly biased, the numbers just don't add up to swing it from 55% opposition to 80% support. It is like Obama picked 80% out of thin air.

In fact, I believe he did. If you were going to make up a statistic off the cuff, more than likely you would use a nice round number. Like 80%. A real statistic would more than likely be 78% or 81%.

You could argue that the real stat was not a nice round number, but that Obama just said 80% for simplicity. Okay, I can buy that. But still you can't go to the public, make an outlandish claim like this, and offer no support to back it up. And he has offered no support, just the same old "because I said so" attitude he takes anytime he is questioned.

The truth is that Americans are opposed to raising taxes to support our current level of spending. Americans have made it abundantly clear, time and time again, since November of 2008, that they want spending reigned in. Entire movements to that effect sprung up after Obama and a Democratic congress rammed a $800 billion plus stimulus down our throats.

And the American people are not as dumb as Obama thinks they are. They know that he inherited a $400 billion deficit from Bush, and turned it into a nearly $2 trillion deficit. The American people aren't so stupid to believe that is sustainable. And they certainly aren't going to buy the line that "we are spending it, so now you have to pay more in taxes to pay for it". That is a line of BOLOGNA.

Cut spending. That is what the American people want. This country has been clamoring for spending to be cut. The crescendo has been building for more than 2 1/2 years now. Only Obama and his fellow Democrats have been deaf to it.

And they could pay for that dearly come November of 2012.

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Obama Takes Ball, Goes Home

What a baby. Seriously.

Click here for story: President Obama abruptly walks out of talks

Seriously? What is he, 12 years-old? I'd love for him to take his case to the American people. In fact, the American people have taken their case to him in every election since November 2008. And they have said overwhelming "CUT SPENDING!!!"

Obama is turning into a bigger idiot than I already thought.

Michael Medved: Obama's Numbers And Claims Don't Add Up

Michael Medved made an outstanding point on his show yesterday, and more conservatives need to pick this up and point it out.

Obama is pushing for $4 trillion dollars in "reductions". I quote that because he wants $3 trillion in spending cuts, coupled with $1 trillion dollars in tax increases.

The Republicans are saying we should cut $2 trillion dollars in spending and leave taxes alone.

Obama is trying to sell his plan to the American people by claiming that the Republicans want to make "draconian" entitlement cuts, while continuing to reward the rich by not raising their taxes.

But his math, as Medved points out, is skewed. He is actually proposing MORE cuts than the Republicans. So his cuts are more draconian than the GOP's are. The only exception is that Obama wants punitive tax increases on the rich. How dare they be rich after all.

Michael Medved has it right. I wish I could find a clip of his comments over at his site, http://www.michaelmedved.com/. Medved said this proves that Obama's goal isn't deficit or spending reductions, but getting the rich to pay higher taxes. I agree.

Kid Rock Is An Idiot

Hat tip to JammieWearingFool

Click here for article: 'All of Them are a Bunch of Idiots'

Kid Rock got political at a party for his platinum-selling album "Born Free." "We don't need a bunch of pot-smoking hippies and we don't need a bunch of Bible Belters [for leaders]," he told us Monday at the Co-Op Penthouse at the Rivington Hotel, adding he's "not sure" if he'll endorse Barack Obama -- whom he backed in 2008 -- for re-election. Of Republican candidates, Rock declared, "All of them are a bunch of idiots."

First let me say that I've always thought Kid Rock was a giant turd. Correct that, WANNABE turd. First he tried to be a hip-hop rapper. Then he turned himself into a rock-rapper. Now he wants to be a country singer. All the while he steals other people's music and just "rewrites" the lyrics.

My opinion on Kid Rock has always been controversial considering I live in Michigan. People here think he is some kind of musical genius superstar rock god. It is kind of sad really. I don't think the guy has a bit of talent. Ted Nugent has more talent in his little finger than Kid Rock will ever have.

But I gave Kid Rock credit for mostly staying above the political fray. I knew in 2008 he endorsed Barack Obama. I figured at the time it was a Hollywood outsider turned celeb trying to be part of the "in" crowd. After all, Kid Rock has always tried to find a place to fit in (see my WANNABE explanation above). But now he is just proving to be a complete idiot.

"All of them are a bunch of idiots."

Seriously Kid? You are bashing people with educations well above a high school level that have served at various levels of government? Some of them are extremely intelligent people that have run cities and states, and in some cases successful businesses. But the are a "bunch of idiots"?

I guess taking the music to Sweet Home Alabama, and rewriting the lyrics to say "Northern Michigan" makes you more intelligent than others that have have written legislation, articles, and even books? If they are a "bunch of idiots" then Kid Rock would do well to aspire to idiocy.

Friday, July 08, 2011

The Face Of An Angel


Caylee Anthony is today in the arms of Christ.

Her mother is headed for the other place.

More Casey Anthony: Reasonable Vs. Unreasonable Doubt

Maybe you are as sick of this case as I am, but reading another blog yesterday it hit me, and I made a comment there to this fact. What the jury got confused over was reasonable vs. unreasonable doubt. I truly believe this is the crux of the issue in the jury's idiotic verdict.

I am not a lawyer, but I know what reasonable doubt means. Reasonable doubt means that after hearing all of the evidence, that it is reasonable to conclude that the defendant is still possibly innocent of the crime charged. Where the reasonable piece comes in is that there is a REASON, based on fact, that you feel this way. The prosecution is not tasked with eliminating every possible doubt a juror might have, only reasonable doubts.

For instance, if I as a juror just couldn't fathom a mother being able to chloroform her 2 year-old daughter, putting duct tape over her mouth and nose, and then putting her in the trunk of her car to die slowly, that is doubt. But it is not a reasonable doubt because we know that human-beings are capable of such atrocities. It might be hard to imagine, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

A reasonable doubt would be if there were nothing else linking the defendant to such a heinous act. For instance, if Casey Anthony had never done a Google search on how to make chloroform, or how to kill someone, or hadn't abandoned her car due to the smell of human decomposition, then it would be reasonable to doubt that she committed the crime. Or if Casey Anthony had been grief stricken after the "disappearance" of her daughter, or she had contacted police the first day of the supposed disappearance, or if she hadn't been out partying and getting tattoo'd, then it would be reasonable that a juror would doubt that she committed the crime.

However, in this case, all of that was true. Factor in that the defense tried to get her declared incompetent to stand trial in the last week of the trial, and you can see that even they thought she was guilty.

Reasonable doubt is not unreasonable. So far everything I've heard the jurors that have spoken out say has been unreasonable. Casey Anthony was a good mother?!? Are you serious? Casey was more believable than George Anthony? Are you kidding me? Only a completely imbecilic moron could conclude those things. And apparently there were at least 12 of them, and more if you count the alternates, in this jury.

In the end a 2 year-old is dead, her mother that was responsible for that death is set to go free, and there are 12 people walking around in the Tampa Bay, Florida area that are responsible for that travesty. So far nothing has been done or said to change my mind that this jury was made up of morons.

Wednesday, July 06, 2011

I Can't Let This Go Without A Comment

This Anthony trial has brought to remembrance the O.J. Simpson trial. While the outcome is similar, there is one GLARING difference.

Please pay attention to reaction outside of the courthouse in relation to the "not guilty" verdict.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


More:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Now juxtapose that with the video outside the courthouse of the Simpson trial, when the mostly black crowd began cheering at the news of a "not guilty" verdict. I won't say much about that, but the difference is striking.

Stupidity Has A Face: Alternate Juror Defends Anthony Verdict

I don't have much to say, but first the clip:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


All I will say is that this guy spends a lot of time talking about reasonable doubt, then turns around and says, definitively, that Casey Anthony didn't get away with murder. Sorry, but that is patently unreasonable. So, based on that, Russell Huekler is as dumb as I thought this entire jury was.

Tuesday, July 05, 2011

Further Proof That People Are Stupid, Casey Anthony Found Not Guilty

I remember watching in horror as the O.J. Simpson verdict was read. Not guilty. How could 12 people believe that O.J. didn't kill his ex-wife and her boyfriend? DNA, circumstantial, and every other kind of evidence pointed directly to it. I could see there being a person or two that didn't believe he did it. I could even see that, in the aftermath of the Rodney King row, that there were African-Americans unwilling of convicting O.J. But that aside, how could 12 people all be so dumb?

So here we are, nearly 16 years later, and yet another high profile trial ends in a completely inconceivable "not guilty" verdict. Anyone with half a brain could see that Casey Anthony is at least responsible for the death of her daughter, Caylee. Yet 12 people are too dumb to see what is so evident.

I have some questions for these 12 dimwits:

  • How do you explain Casey Anthony's behavior in days following her daughter's "disappearance"?
  • How do you explain Casey Anthony's lies to her parents about her daughter's where-abouts in days following her disappearance?
  • How do you explain Casey Anthony's complete lack of grief at the supposed disappearance of her daughter, and for showing no remorse at the discovery of her body?
  • How do you explain Casey Anthony looking up chloroform, and methods of killing someone, on the family PC?
  • How do you explain her ditching her car due to the smell of "human decomposition"?
  • How do you explain Casey Anthony, well into the trial, filing a motion trying to be declared incompetent to stand trial?

I'd love for the jurors to explain all this to me. Granted, I understand, they've been sequestered for weeks. But still, these are questions that are still unanswered. How any rational person could allow a monster like Casey Anthony to walk away, completely scot free, is beyond me.

Another blow was struck this afternoon for mass stupidity in our society. Congratulations to you 12 complete morons.